Tottenham 1-2 Leicester: Stats & Analysis

Sophie Wakehurst

You need 3 min read

·

Post on Jan 27, 2025

41 visitor like this post

Share

Tottenham 1-2 Leicester: Stats & Analysis

Leicester City secured a hard-fought 2-1 victory over Tottenham Hotspur at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, leaving Spurs with their second consecutive league defeat. This match showcased a thrilling encounter with contrasting styles and tactical approaches, ultimately decided by Leicester's clinical finishing and resolute defense. This detailed analysis will delve into the key statistics and tactical aspects that shaped the game's outcome.

Key Statistics: A Tale of Two Halves

The statistics paint a picture of a game dominated in different phases by each team. While Tottenham enjoyed a greater share of possession, particularly in the first half, Leicester's efficiency in front of goal proved decisive.

• Possession: Tottenham (58%) vs Leicester (42%) - Tottenham's dominance in possession suggests a controlled approach, yet it failed to translate into enough clear-cut chances.

• Shots: Tottenham (18) vs Leicester (10) - While Tottenham fired more shots, Leicester's shots were more on target, highlighting their clinical edge.

• Shots on Target: Tottenham (6) vs Leicester (5) – This indicates that, despite the higher number of total shots, Tottenham struggled to accurately test the Leicester goalkeeper.

• Pass Completion: Tottenham (82%) vs Leicester (75%) – Tottenham's higher pass completion rate reflects their attempts to build play from the back, however, it didn't consistently break down the Leicester defense.

• Key Passes: Tottenham (8) vs Leicester (5) – Although Tottenham created more key passes, they struggled to capitalize on these opportunities. Leicester's effectiveness in converting fewer chances proved far more influential.

Tactical Analysis: A Clash of Styles

Tottenham's possession-based approach contrasted with Leicester's more direct, counter-attacking style. This tactical disparity shaped the game's flow.

Tottenham's Struggles:

• Lack of cutting edge: While dominating possession, Tottenham lacked the incisiveness needed to break down Leicester's well-organized defense. Their final ball frequently lacked precision, leading to missed opportunities.

• Defensive vulnerabilities: Despite periods of control, Tottenham's defense appeared susceptible to Leicester's pace and directness on the counter-attack. Leicester's goals were a testament to their ability to exploit these weaknesses.

Leicester's Effectiveness:

• Clinical finishing: Leicester's clinical finishing was a key factor in their victory. They capitalised on their limited chances, highlighting their efficiency in front of goal.

• Effective counter-pressing: Leicester's pressing and counter-pressing disrupted Tottenham's rhythm, forcing errors and creating opportunities. Their ability to swiftly transition from defense to attack was highly effective.

• Disciplined defending: Leicester's disciplined and organized defense effectively neutralized Tottenham's attacking threat, limiting their clear-cut chances.

Conclusion: Leicester's Deserved Victory

Leicester's 2-1 victory over Tottenham was a well-deserved result. Despite Tottenham's dominance in possession and total shots, Leicester's clinical finishing, effective counter-attacking, and resolute defending proved decisive. The match highlighted the importance of efficiency in front of goal and the ability to exploit defensive vulnerabilities. This result underscores Leicester's growing strength and Tottenham's continued struggle for consistency. Further analysis into individual player performances and tactical adjustments could provide additional insights into this intriguing encounter.