Bannon's Influence: French Far-Right CPAC No-Show

Sophie Wakehurst

You need 3 min read

·

Post on Feb 22, 2025

49 visitor like this post

Share

Bannon's Influence: French Far-Right CPAC No-Show

The recent absence of prominent figures from France's far-right at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Dallas, Texas, has sparked speculation about shifting alliances and the waning influence of Steve Bannon. While the event boasted a strong international presence, the noticeable lack of participation from key French far-right leaders raises questions about the future of transatlantic populist connections.

The Expected Presence and the Unexpected Absence

CPAC, known for its gathering of conservative and populist voices from around the globe, had anticipated the participation of several influential figures from France's far-right. Their absence, however, has been interpreted by many as a significant development. The anticipated presence of these figures, who often align with the broader themes of nationalism and anti-establishment sentiment promoted at CPAC, fuelled expectations of robust discussions and networking opportunities. This absence invites scrutiny into the dynamics of the international far-right.

The Role of Steve Bannon

Steve Bannon, a key figure in the rise of populist movements globally and a former advisor to President Donald Trump, has long been associated with cultivating relationships within Europe's far-right. His involvement and strategic guidance have often been cited as a crucial factor in the international networking and coordination among these groups. The muted presence of French far-right representatives at CPAC may signify a change in their relationship with Bannon and, potentially, a recalibration of their strategic partnerships.

Potential Explanations for the No-Show

Several explanations have been offered for the conspicuous absence of French far-right leaders from CPAC. These include:

• Strategic Divergence: It is possible that these leaders are pursuing independent strategies, prioritizing domestic political maneuvers over international collaborations. The evolving political landscape in France might be demanding more focused attention on national issues.

• Shifting Alliances: The far-right landscape is dynamic. Internal divisions and shifting alliances could explain the lack of participation. Competing factions and disagreements on strategy might have led to a deliberate decision to avoid CPAC.

• Decreased Bannon Influence: Bannon’s influence, though still potent, might be diminishing. The lack of prominent French representatives at CPAC may indicate a decreased reliance on his strategic guidance and a move toward greater autonomy within the French far-right movement.

• Concerns about CPAC's Image: The event's image and reputation might have become a deterrent. With a more overt focus on Trumpism and certain factions of the American conservative movement, some far-right figures in Europe might have chosen to distance themselves.

Implications for the Future of Transatlantic Populism

The French far-right's absence from CPAC has implications beyond a single event. It speaks to the complex and ever-evolving nature of international populist movements. The lack of strong French representation suggests that the previously strong transatlantic ties, often facilitated by figures like Bannon, may be weakening or changing in character.

Conclusion

The unexpected absence of prominent figures from France's far-right at CPAC raises important questions about the future of transatlantic populist connections and the enduring influence of Steve Bannon. While the reasons remain speculative, the event highlights the fluid and often unpredictable dynamics within the global far-right landscape. Further analysis and observation are crucial to fully understand the implications of this noticeable shift. The future trajectory of these relationships will likely play a significant role in shaping the broader political landscape both in France and internationally.